Draft for public comment, version 0.1. It sets out the safety principles and practices Dunster intends to follow. It is not a warranty, certification or promise about any product, and it does not change any contract. Goals such as zero medication errors are goals, not claims.
© 2026 Dunster Physical AI. All rights reserved. You may read this draft and quote brief passages to comment on it. Any other use, including copying, adapting or distributing it, needs Dunster's written permission. To adopt any part of the Safety Principles, contact info@dunster.ai.
Ground rules
Every article follows one order of priorities and six design rules.
When two duties conflict, the lower number wins:
- Never injure a person, by contact or through the result of the robot's work.
- Reach the safe state when anyone signals stop.
- Keep harm from spreading to other people, property or materials.
- Follow instructions from authorized people.
- Do the task well.
- Protect the robot itself.
| Design rule | What it means |
|---|---|
| Safety sits below the AI | A separate safety layer enforces the limits. The AI can make the robot more careful, never less. |
| Stop means safe state | Each motion names its own safe state, because freezing can trap a person and letting go can drop a load. |
| Three kinds of contact | Intended contact (a handover), incidental contact (a brush) and collision each have their own limits. |
| Stop fast, resume slow | One credible signal stops motion. Restarting needs a sustained all-clear and, near people, a person's yes. |
| Every rule is a record | Each rule has a limit, a sensor, a response, a test and an owner. |
| Everything is recorded | Each robot keeps an event record, so the cause of any incident can be found. |
The structure
The Safety Principles have eight parts and 35 articles. This draft publishes Parts I, III and IV in full, with three annexes; the other parts follow in later drafts.
| Part | Articles | In this draft |
|---|---|---|
| I. Foundations | 1 Purpose and scope · 2 Order of priorities · 3 Definitions and classes · 4 Force of the rules | Full text |
| II. Human and physical AI as a team | 5 Roles and stated limits · 6 Feedback both ways · 7 Signals and consent before motion | To follow |
| III. Command, autonomy and emergencies | 8 Who may instruct · 9 Operating envelope · 10 Stop and safe state · 11 Containing an incident · 12 Humanoid conduct | Full text |
| IV. Physical interaction | 13 Contact classes and body limits · 14 Rebound and debounce · 15 Objects and surroundings · 16 Motion guardrail catalog · 17 Hardware, energy, software and security | Full text |
| V. Lifecycle | 18 Development and proof · 19 Installation and training · 20 Maintenance and inspection · 21 Service, updates, recalls and retirement · 22 Event recorder and incident reports | To follow |
| VI. Protection, liability and insurance | 23 Vehicle-safety principles adopted · 24 People protected · 25 Who is responsible · 26 Coverage model · 27 Who pays · 28 Deductibles and premiums | To follow |
| VII. Settings and profiles | 29 Pharmacy settings · 30 Further profiles (reserved) · 31 New settings | Annex A previews Article 29 |
| VIII. Governance and the guardrail database | 32 Guardrail database · 33 Amendment and versioning · 34 Conformance and audit · 35 Publication and adoption | To follow |
Annex A applies the rules in pharmacies, Annex B shows example guardrail records for a robot working in one, and Annex C maps U.S. vehicle safety law to the articles.
How to comment
Comments are open for 60 days from publication. Dunster then plans to publish version 1.0 with a summary of what changed in response.
Comments posted here are public. Comments and emails are not treated as confidential, and Dunster may use them to improve the Safety Principles. Please don't send patient information or anyone's confidential material. To raise a safety or security concern privately, email info@dunster.ai.
The Dunster Physical AI Safety Rating, powered by the Dunster Physical AI Benchmarking Engine, scores a robot against these Safety Principles, clause by clause, at dunster.ai/safety. It is indicative only, not a certification or an insurance quote.
Dunster Physical AI publishes these Safety Principles; its products and roadmap are described at dunster.ai.
References
The standards, laws and studies this draft cites, as checked in October 2026.
Robot safety
- ISO 10218-1 and 10218-2:2025, industrial robot safety (A3 summary)
- ISO 10218-2:2025 Annex M body-region limits (comparative analysis)
- Annex M hand and finger limit (Robotiq)
- Transient contact limits (study)
- ISO 13855 approach speeds (Leuze)
- IEC 60204-1 stop categories and ISO 13850
- Stop function priority (Kollmorgen)
- ISO/FDIS 13482, service robots
- ISO/CD 25785-1, dynamically stable mobile robots
- ANSI/A3 R15.08, industrial mobile robots
- ANSI/CAN/UL 3300:2025, service robots
- SAE J3016 terms in state law (Texas)
- Generating Robot Constitutions and Benchmarks for Semantic Safety
Workplace and vehicle law
- OSHA: robotics standards, including lock-out
- OSHA: reporting a fatality or severe injury
- 49 CFR Part 571, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
- 49 CFR 573.6, defect reports
- 49 CFR Part 563, event data recorders
- 49 CFR Part 567, certification
- NHTSA Standing General Order on crash reporting
- FMVSS 127, automatic emergency braking (status)
Pharmacy and health data

Comments
Comments are open for 60 days from publication. Comments posted here are public once Dunster Physical AI has reviewed them. Comments and emails are not treated as confidential, and Dunster may use them to improve the Safety Principles. Please don’t send patient information or anyone’s confidential material. To raise a safety or security concern privately, email info@dunster.ai.
No comments on this page yet.